Conveniently everyone seem to have forgotten that under Lawson, Pakistan won the Tri-series last week.
Granted, public memory is short - but this is amazing.
| Played | Won | Lost | No Result/Tied | Won% |
| 688 | 328 | 327 | 30/3 | 47.67 |
This is Alpesh from linq.in and I loved your blog as i am also a big cricket fan and I would like to inform you that your blog has got the following awards.
1.Best Sports Blog of all time.
2.Best Sports Blog of week on 2008-06-29.
Check it out here Awards
Linq tracks posts from Indian blogs and lists them in order of recent interest. We offer syndication opportunities and many tools for bloggers to use in there web sites such as the widget below:
Linq awards
By adding this widget you would be able to know the Weekly Statistics of your blog and the various details such as Rank,Votes and the Awards you get from Linq.
Alpesh
www.linq.in
This is a copy of the email saying In the Name of Cricket is the best sports blog of all time.
I do not want to sound ungrateful, but can any of you throw light on how this 'honor' came about?
Despite having some of the biggest name in ODI cricket in their team, Deccan Chargers failed to make an impression in the inaugural IPL tournamnet.
Deccan Chargers believe their fortune will change once they sign up Darren Lehman as their coach.
I remember the media reporting a rift between Dhoni and Sehwag during the CB series.
Now here is another speculative report.
A television channel had reported that there was a rift between skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni and senior batsman Virender Sehwag following the Delhi batsman's exclusion from the team in the last match against Bangladesh.
One thing in common in the two reports is the timing. Whenever Sehwag is 'rested', the speculation starts.If I remember correctly, in an earlier tour, there were speculative reports that Sehwag, who was having a patchy form, wanted to play down the order and Dhoni disagreed. Then too speculation of a rift was rife.
As these reports consistently talk of a rift, I assume they are fanned by interested parties.
Relatedly it makes me wonder why Sehwag receives bad press?
Shoaib Malik made explosive remarks during the post match press conference. Observers feel the after effects of the statement will take a long time to subside. On being asked uncomfortable questions regarding the team composition Malik said,
"I have to play with the team that the selectors provide," He was immediately set upon by the journalists, who shot back: "Do you mean the selectors don't take your view into consideration? Do you have a say at all?" To this, Malik replied: "I give my views, but the selectors take the final decision."
Hmm... is Malik finally showing some spine or do we consider it as a Freudian slip?
Indeed, Indian Cricket is a money spinner. It not only makes money for itself, it generates money for other countries too.
"Sri Lanka Cricket is pleased to inform that all financial liabilities with banks, including pending overdrafts over Rs.600 million, have been settled on the 20th of June 2008 with payments received from the sale of TV rights for the upcoming Indian Tour of Sri Lanka."
If an Indian cricket tour helps Sri Lanka Cricket board wipe out its financial liabilities, imagine how much cricket boards like the CA or the ECB profit from an Indian Tour.
No wonder they bend over backwards.
Grant Elliott's controversial run out reminded me of one other run - out which caused a crowd invasion.
I am not sure whether it was at Karachi or at Lahore, India were playing Pakistan when at the fall of a wicket Javed Miandad walked in to join a well-set Wasim Raja.
Mind you, Wasim Raja was making a come back of sorts and was in great touch, when the unthinkable happened.
Miandad called Wasim for a run and then scampered back to his crease leaving Wasim stranded mid-pitch.
For once, the Indian fielding was quick on its feet and Wasim was run-out.
What happened later was scary. First there was a huge hiss from the stands then followed by a roar. The crowd just decimated the pickets and went for Miandad.
Miandad, the Indian team, umpires et all ran for their lives.
P.S. I watched this on TV. Unfortunately, do not remember which India -Pakistan series this happened. Can someone help?
Lee and Sreesanth seem to specialize in them and between them; Sreesanth’s beamers are viewed with more suspicion.
However, a new entrant, Yasir Arafat takes the cake. He bowled two beamers, supposedly accidental, in the space of three balls during Kent’s T20 clash with Essex last week and earned three penalty points for his pains.
It makes one wonder, whether there is anything unintentional about beamers.
To all those who wonder at what these fat cat cricketers do with IPL money, check this out.
Herschelle Gibbs' wife has asked for a hefty maintenance cost during their divorce proceedings Reportedly, Gibbs IPL earnings may yet save him from bankruptcy.
Recently a section of the media (who else but the English media) declared Pietersen's 'switch hitting' as a pioneering moment in the game.
These claims coming from a besotted English press has been ably challenged by others.
Leaving Pietersen's debatable pioneering moment aside, I consider the employment of covers to protect the pitch from the elements as a pioneering moment.
Until then, the state of the pitch was a major factor in the game. As the match wore on, the exposed pitch used to exhibit contrasting behavior. There were marked differences in its behavior during the morning and the late afternoon session and a huge difference between the first days play and the finals days play.
The employment of the cover killed this unpredictability and tilted what was a tussle between the bat, ball and the elements into a uni-dimensional batsman's game.
It is certainly not a desired change, but a pioneering moment nevertheless.
Related Read: Lawrence Booth list six inventions that changed the game of cricket.
An article 70 years of Televised Cricket in The Herald takes us back to BBC's early attempts at televising a Test match.
The article is interesting as it brings out how cricket and television broadcasting has evolved hand in hand.
BTW,the first Test match to be relayed in Chennai was the West Indies tour of India (1974-1975).
G.R.Vishwanath scored a unbeaten 97 not out out of a total of 190, an innings The Wisden 100 lists as the 38th best innings of all time.
Mind you he scored the bulk of his runs with tail-enders at the other end. The tail-enders included Prassana and Chandrasekhar both renowned for their lame- duck batting.
The way Vishy, as he is called, handled the bowling, invariably scoring in boundaries and then taking a run of the last ball is a lesson for any batsmen to imbibe.
Cruelly, he was denied a century as Chandrasekhar got out to the last ball of the over, (the only ball he faced in that over).
In a way it set of my addiction to watching cricket on Television.
"Also looks like ECB may not be able to participate due to ICL issue. Maybe
ECB/Stanford and ICL should join hands and have another champions league to
counter this."
Those interviewed consider him to be an cynical manipulator of his team mates and also as a swindler.
However, the most interesting part of the documentary was an admission by Marlon Aronstam, who, according to the news report is a 'corrupt professional gambler, that the Indian Police outsmarted Hansie.
"Corrupt professional gambler Marlon Aronstam said he had advised Hansie to remain silent and not to admit that he was involved in match-fixing.
"That was the biggest mistake that he made."
Aronstam said he still believed today that Indian recordings of conversations between Hansie and professional gamblers did not exist.
"The Indian police played poker with Hansie and he folded first."
Personally I feel, Hansie was done in by his own ego. He wanted to prove how smart he was and that accounted for his admission.
Giles Smith lists five simple but effective ways to react if some self-adoring, publicity-hungry smart-arse attempts at switch-hitting.
1 Aim for his head
Whether he takes a left-hand or right-hand stance, the batsman's head will be in roughly the same place, give or take a few inches, and definitely at the same height.
2 Increase the sledging
This almost goes without saying, but anyone who thinks your bowling is something he can mess with on his weaker side is clearly in need of a good talking-to.
3 Use rotten fruit
The old garden favourite whereby, unbeknown to the batsman, the bowler conceals a second missile in his hand and then, to the batsman's surprise and alarm, bowls not the ball but (for example) a wasp-destroyed windfall.
4 Break out the jellybeans
Dropping obscurely suggestive items of confectionery near the crease may be just the ticket when it comes to destabilising the wannabe switch-hitter, at least if you time it correctly and choose the right colour jellybean.
5 Bowler-on-bowler action
Two balls, two bowlers, one coming in from each end simultaneously. Double the action, double the fun, with collisions, run-outs, concussions - total Rollerball-style, hand-to-hand mayhem, and with the added value of getting the statutory overs bowled in half the time.
I suggest rotten eggs instead of rotten fruit, it leaves a smell that should remind a switch-hitter to desist in the future.
Which is as it should be.
Having his commitment questioned for labeling IPL a paid holiday, Steyn realises quickly that he is foolhardy to prick the revolution (IPL) taking place in cricket.
As George Orwell said, " Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" and as his back-tracking suggests Steyn is no revolutionary.
However, Steyn spoke the truth. IPL is a paid holiday for a cricketer like Steyn, who is in prime form and a pension fund for spent forces like Pollack.
Isn't that the truth?
As expected the decision to let players refer decisions to the third umpire has brought the old chestnut 'sanctity of the umpires' out again.
Pray, what is this 'umpire must be respected' and the rest of the hogwash'?
An umpire is "an official who supervises play and enforces the rules of the game in some sports, e.g. cricket and baseball" and in the nascent days,an umpire was a supposedly impartial bystander drafted to do the job.
An umpire is a supervisor- thats it, he is not God. So treating them as persons beyond pale is unwarranted. Lets treat them as humans and consider innovations as aids to help them discharge their duties better.
Similarly, it is time to stop thinking of 'referrals' as a device to belittle them. It will serve to enhance their standing.
Consider this, when an umpire makes an error, which is obvious to others, he loses respect (Steve Bucknor is an example.) Furthermore, it is important to give the right decision and by 'referral' an umpire is doing just that, he is putting the game above the individual and showing himself to be beyond petty ego.
By signaling a 'referral', an umpire shows himself as human and capable of correcting his error. It will make the umpiring trade less pompous and humane and probably shatter the image of umpires having their own agendas.
Surely you will agree " The best umpired game is the game in which the fans cannot recall the umpires who worked it."
'The shot will create a lot of problems. How do you deal with lbws and wides? Do you treat the batsman as right-hander or a left-hander?' the legendary umpire was quoted as saying in the Daily Telegraph.
The BCCI has sent a notice asking Sreesanth to explain the altercation he had with a city hotel.
The BCCI is clearly exceeding its brief.
For, why should it be bothered with what Sreesanth does in his personal time?
This article compares his switch-hitting to many other sports pioneering moments.
Interestingly it considers Muralitharan's Doosra as another.
Which brings us to the similarities between the doosra and switch- hitting.
Are there more similarities?
Holding has this to say about it.
"Bowlers have to say which hand they are bowling with, so I don't see why batsmen should be allowed to change from right-handers to left-handers at a whim."
I am in agreement, even if it is for a ball, a batsmen has to declare his intentions in advance.
Your opinion?
PCB has put one over the BCCI. After weeks of effort, the Pakistan Cricket Board has finally managed to rope in sponsors for a Twenty20 tri-series against West Indies and Bangladesh in Canada from August 13 to 16.
A PCB official said the Twenty20 tournament was being organised to exploit the growing popularity of the new form of the game particularly since it was the best way to woo fans in North America.
How did the BCCI miss this money making opportunity?
| |
Summing up the just concluded West-Indies - Australia Test series Ricky Ponting makes an unusual statement.
It's the style of play more than anything else. You have to accept that the game may go into the fifth day and you have to be patient. You have to grind an innings out, or in the middle of a bowling spell, not try to attack too much.
"When you attack too much, runs begin to flow, and the batting team gets momentum in the game, and it starts slipping away from you.
This statement contradicts a common cricketing wisdom that "attack is the best form of defense".
So what does Ponting mean?
Most probably, Ponting has used the word 'attack' to mean 'experimentation'. In essence he is saying that during a Test match there will be one or more passages of play where the bowling team should just stick to the basics.
Bowl a line and length, deny boundary scoring opportunities and field sharply. Then the pressure will mount on the batsmen and they will try to be innovative and take risks. This will provide the bowling team the opportunity to dismiss them.
India's test cricket tour of Sri-Lanka starting next month will see players appealing against an umpire's decision for the first time.
However, how will a player signal an appeal?
"For reviews concerning potential dismissals, the player should then indicate 'out' by raising his finger above his head or indicate 'not out' by crossing his hands in a horizontal position side-to-side in front and above his waist three times. "
The ICC appears to have taken a easy way out and modified Billy Bowden's antics.
Technorati Tags: ECB, Stanford, Twenty20
Indo-Pak cricket in the ‘80s and ‘90s was full of superstition — like playing a Friday final meant Pakistan’s win was a given, while a Saturday schedule suited the Indians. The Indians were supposed to be gentle souls, firmly vegetarian — though there wasn’t a formal veg/non-veg head-count taken, and nor was there a science-paper published linking not eating meat to not being mean. But, they generally ended losers. Pakistan, on the other hand, were boisterous, ate everything, had factions in their team and more captains than one could count. But they always won.
For once I am in complete agreement with Ponting.
He is not too excited about the idea of the Test World Championship.
"You're playing for a trophy every series you play," Ponting said. "It doesn't matter if it's at the end of two or three or four years, there are trophies on the line every series. We've got to look at other smaller ways."
Ah! The small ways confounds everyone.
Do you agree with him?
Asked what he thought needed to be improved in the team, Lawson said: "Oh well, there're a couple of senior players who really are legends in their own country, who sometimes don't train as hard as they should and sometimes when a game gets into a pressure situation, they don't actually perform." Lawson also said he had been trying to get rid of the team's "hierarchy system."
The banned West Indian all rounder Marlon Samuel may get a reprieve as the ICC is set to review his case.
It may mean that he can play for the
However, it seems a travesty of justice to ban him without following the due process of law. In a way the failure to follow the process may well save him even if his guilty.