Image by PurpleValentine via FlickrModi has set the cat among the pigeons by talking of two IPL’s a year. I am all for it and suggest Modi should not stop with two; there should be two if not three IPL.
To make IPL interesting, I go so far to suggest that franchisees should have a different set of players with a limitation of just 2 or 3 players playing in all the tournaments.
I am all for more IPL because I believe, a meaningless IPL is far more entertaining and is of much superior quality than a meaningless Test.
Mind you, I use the word ‘quality’ with a purpose. Everyone will agree that in a IPL match there are two teams with top rung players playing, whereas you cannot say the same about the teams playing a Test (outside the ‘iconic’ series).
When quality cricketers participate, it follows automatically that we get to see quality games. Unquestionably, everyone would prefer watching top-drawer stuff.
To make IPL interesting, I go so far to suggest that franchisees should have a different set of players with a limitation of just 2 or 3 players playing in all the tournaments.
I am all for more IPL because I believe, a meaningless IPL is far more entertaining and is of much superior quality than a meaningless Test.
Mind you, I use the word ‘quality’ with a purpose. Everyone will agree that in a IPL match there are two teams with top rung players playing, whereas you cannot say the same about the teams playing a Test (outside the ‘iconic’ series).
When quality cricketers participate, it follows automatically that we get to see quality games. Unquestionably, everyone would prefer watching top-drawer stuff.
2 comments:
HAVE TWO MORE AND KILL THIS GOLDEN EGG LAYING HEN .
lviss,
I would be happy if that happens.
Post a Comment