Minnesota Cricket Association hosts Western Conference Championship from July 31.

Minnesota Cricket Association (MCA) will host USA Cricket Associations' (USACA) Western Conference Championship from July 31 - August 2 at Bryn Mawr Meadows Park, Minneapolis.

This 3 day national cricket tournament will bring the best of cricketing talent from nearly half of the USA, namely from the Central-East, Central-West, South-West & North-West Regions.

The competition will be a keenly contested and widely watched one, as USACA selectors will be onsite to identify the top talent to represent USA National Cricket Team.

A local Select Source International (SSI), is one of the premier sponsors of the tournament.

Source: Minnesota Cricket Association Press Release

---

Advertisement

Buy The Tented Field: A History of Cricket in Americaand learn how cricket developed in the USA. The book includes "a state by state, city by city listing of 19th century American cricket clubs from around the country".

---

Test Cricket Ain’t the ‘Crown Jewels’

Telegraph (UK) reports that “BBC will not call for live Test match cricket to be restored to the A-list of 'Crown Jewel' events protected for free-to-air television”.

For the last year or so BBC’s decision not to bid for broadcasting Test cricket has been a subject of intense debate and criticism.

The BBC has covered Test matches in England for the last 50 years and hence the terrestrial relay of Test matches had an iconic status among cricket fans in England. Therefore, BBC’s refusal to bid, probably due to lack of funds, had many aficionados urging the Government to classify Test match broadcast under the A-list of Crown Jewel events.

By classifying an event as A-list Crown Jewel event, the event is considered too important to be confined to users of cable and satellite TV and hence private broadcasters are restrained from bidding for exclusive rights.

Damningly for Domestic Test cricket in England, the BBC believes that Test cricket fails to justify for addition to the A- list. Instead, it has argued for the inclusion of the finals of ODI World Cup and Twenty20 World Cup. (BTW, there is no mention of this in BBC’s report. )

BBC’s recommendations clearly reveal that Test cricket is in its final throes and ODI’s and Twenty20 cricket are set to take its place.

Advertisement

Click on BBC Guide to Cricket commentaries and other classics and buy classic BBC Test match cricket stuff

Warne’isms

Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Shane Warne missed the first Test at Cardiff due to his Poker commitments.

However, he was there with the others of the Sky Sports commentary team for the 2nd s Test at Lord’s.

To say that he did not disappoint is an understatement. He exceeded my expectations with the typical Australian forthright style of commenting.

His own odd turn of phrase and the fact he was commentating during a rare Australian debacle at Lord’s gave it additional gloss.

Here is a compilation of his peculiar turn of language for your enjoyment.

I hope he does not repeat himself during the 3rd Test.

Advertisement

Why don’t you buy Shane Warne related memorabilia through me?
Click on Shane Warne and make your purchases.

Sleeping with the knee machine

Flintoff’s determination to sleep with a Knee Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) Machine is commendable.

It amply illustrates his desire, dedication and determination to play in the remaining Ashes Tests.

Truly, here is a man ready to do anything for the honour of playing for his country.

Importantly, one should commend his wife for putting up with Flintoff’s predilections.

Ricky on a rocky surface.

I suspect Rouse; the Edgabston curator of playing mind games.

First, he said the pitch was like “jelly”. Now he says that the pitch will assist seamers.

To add meat to my suspicion is the fact that he is the same curator who in 2005 claimed the pitch was a minefield and it turned out to be as smooth as Rosa Acosta.

Which brings me to the question of the day, will Ricky Ponting heed Rouse’s words or will he double guess him?

What ails Wasim Akram?

Image by Amanda_Joelle via Flickr

Why is Wasim Akram desperately offering his services?

A couple of days ago, he volunteered to help Mitchell Johnson.

Yesterday, he was ready to help Indian bowlers if asked.

In between, he has asked the ICC to maintain the ‘sacredness’ of Test cricket. (The last bit was certainly in the hope that he could land a plump post with them).

If you wondered why he has desisted from offering his services to Pakistani cricket, he says PCB is ignoring him.

The sudden flurry of press briefings, unsolicited advice and offers to help appears strange and dare say unbecoming.

Overall, one gets the impression that he is making himself visible to make money.

Which makes us wonder where has the loot he made as a cricketer gone?

Has he fallen prey to Pakistani style ‘Madoff pyramid scheme’?

What if Pakistan is banned ?

Image via Wikipedia

Pakistan appears reconciled to the fact that they have lost the opportunity to host World Cup 2011 in their soil.

However, they are concerned about how the Government of India will react to letting the Pakistan team and their supporters into India for the World Cup.

This is indeed a legitimate worry. The BCCI has been maintaining that the GOI has stopped them from sending their team to Pakistan. Similarly, the Pakistan player’s participation in the IPL was jeopardized for the same reason.

As both Governments seem disinclined let go the rhetoric, it is doubtful whether things would change dramatically overnight.

So let us hope ICC’s Chairman David Morgan comes up with a solution when PCB Chairman Ijaz Butt meets him on Tuesday.

Ganguly 2 Australia 0

That is how the score line reads when a contest of will takes place between Saurav Ganguly and Australian coaches.

The first confrontation took place between Ganguly and Greg the ‘Guru’ Chappell, Ganguly lost his captaincy and then his place in the Indian squad only to return triumphant. Net result, Greg Chappell had to run away with tail between his legs.

Following that Ganguly had a run in with John ‘the chaos theory’ Buchanan during IPL 2. Though Ganguly lost the captaincy, he managed to hold on to his place in Shah Rukh Khan’s Kolkata Knight Riders.

However, this confrontation too ended in Ganguly triumphantly ascending the captaincy throne again. In between Buchanan’s contract was not renewed.

Now, tell me whether my score line is correct?

Sri Lanka seal 2-0 series win

Resuming at 183-3, Kumar Sangakkara's unbeaten 130 helped Sri Lanka draw the third and final Test against Pakistan in Colombo.

Though Sri Lanka was in an admirable position to race to a win at teatime, the defensive field set by Younis Khan, and some dour batting by the Sri Lankan's meant that the match was called off with 101 runs needed from the 16 remaining over's. For the record Sri Lanka was 391-4 when play was called off.

With this draw, Sri Lanka closed the series at 2-0 and consolidated their 4^th place ranking in the Reliance Mobile ICC Test Championship table.

Sri Lanka Cricket honoured Chaminda Vaas, who played his last Test, with a memento and one million Sri Lankan rupees in cash.

Previous Post:

The Tasman Mutiny

The Tasman Mutiny

Interesting happenings in Kiwi land.

Six New Zealand players have decided to forgo IPL next March in favour of the scheduled Australian tour.

For the record Daniel Vettori, Brendon McCullum, Kyle Mills, Jacob Oram, Jesse Ryder and Ross Taylor are supposed to be the six players who have made the sacrifice.

However, one is unsure whether it is a one-off decision or a decision to avoid IPL altogether.

If one looks at it with a skeptical eye, it could well be a crafty plan hatched by Modi to force ICC to create a window for the IPL.

Alternatively, it could be plan hatched by ICC to dismantle the IPL edifice, but then it appears too far-fetched and unbelievable.

What do you think?

Watson admits impotency

Yep, none other than Australia’s resident metro sexual, Shane Watson admitted that Australia is impotent without sledging.

To those bemused by the correlation between Australia’s poor performance during the 2nd Ashes Test at Lord’s and sledging, remind me to tell you the story of a man who was unable to ‘perform’ without calling his wife a whore.

Bonus to our loyal readers:

Some Nude Sledging

A Course on Medieval Swearing

A guide to Australian style swearing.

Related articles by Zemanta

• A mouth-watering day ahead. (midoff.blogspot.com)

Koertzen blames players

Is he right in doing so?

Before we answer that question let us first read what he told Cricinfo:

"The players will stand there, nick the ball and wait for the umpire to make a decision. For me, that's cheating. Why don't you get off the field and make it easy for the game? There would be more pleasure in the game. I know that Ponting would say, 'Boys, let's try [accepting the umpires word].' I've been in those meetings when he said, 'Let's try it,' and then you get to the second day in a Test match and a guy claims a catch and ten minutes later you hear, 'The ball didn't carry,' and then the argument starts again. Let's use the technology when it's there."

Ostensibly, he was reacting to criticism about his inconsistent decisions in the on going Ashes series and so at first glance may appear as if he is shifting blame.

However, when we give his comments the respect it deserves, then realization of how true it is strikes us.

A majority of you will agree that the melodrama enacted by the players on the field serves to paint the umpires and their decision-making capabilities in poor light.

Even this writer did not know the fact that if an on field umpire is sure, then a decision cannot be referred to the third umpire. Even the Chief Executive of CA did not know it either, and he had to confirm it with ICC.

"I did ring (ICC operations manager) Dave Richardson to seek clarification on the referral situation, but in no way was it any kind of complaint," Sutherland said yesterday. "I was seeking to understand the reason for the inconsistency and it was explained to my satisfaction."

When you realize that this is what happened in the case of Hughes, it is not Koertzen but Ricky Ponting who comes across in poor light.

No wonder, Koertzen is disgusted with the antics of the players and favours the referral system.

To the reader: Is Koertzen justified in his disgust?

Advertisement

Click Tom Smith's New Cricket Umpiring and Scoring: The Internationally Recognised and Definitive Guide to the Interpretation and Application of the Laws of Cricket
and buy now

Pakistan thwarts Lankan ambitions

Sri Lanka went into the 3rd and final Test against Pakistan intent on a whitewash, but excellent bowling by Pakistan spinners has reduced them to trying to save the Test.

At close of play on the 2nd day, Pakistan has extended their lead to 88 runs. Unless there is a dramatic collapse, (which is likely) Pakistan can dictate terms. In fact, there is so much time left, that Pakistan can bat through the 3 rd day and time their declaration on the 4 th day.

Ideally, for Pakistan, their batsmen will have to post a huge total and from the looks of it, they need Yousuf to fire. If either Malik and or Younis come good, the Sri Lankan’s could well be chasing another record total for victory. 

 

Related articles by Zemanta

• Wart! Shoaib Akthar declares himself fit. (midoff.blogspot.com)

The ‘Heat’ of the Moment

Flintoff, arms akimbo- we understand, but what is Onions ‘up’ to?

Is this what they call the ‘heat’ of the moment?

Hat Tip: Dead Spin 

A ‘listing’ controversy

Cricket is a game where it is impossible to get two fans to agree on a team composition. The same dysfunction arises when it comes to getting fans to agree on the best players of an era. So imagine the controversy a definitive search on the best players of all time will create.

That is why one believes this is an exercise designed to get eyeballs and with an eye at controversy.

One can say they (Cricinfo) have achieved their ends. For starters, the Western Australian media are already playing up the omission of Ponting. Some have trumpeted gleefully that Ponting is the 12th man. Similarly, the exclusion of Steve Waugh and the inclusion of Gilchrist will draw the ire of their fans.

These ‘lists’ are subjective and hence never definitive. This gives room for controversies that will draw cricket fans to the Cricinfo site in the same mesmerizing manner as a firefly’s luminescence draws its prey.

Cricinfo's Australian All-Time XI:

Victor Trumper, Arthur Morris, Don Bradman, Greg Chappell, Allan Border, Keith Miller, Adam Gilchrist, Shane Warne, Bill O'Reilly, Dennis Lillee, Glenn McGrath, Ricky Ponting (12th man).

Pakistan negates Sri Lanka’s early thrust.

3rd Test Match, Sri Lanka Vs Pakistan, Sinhalese Sports Club

Sangakkara signaled his intention of going for a whitewash by putting Pakistan in. The fact that it rained for the past few days may have made his decision to field easier.

Straight away Thilan Thushara validated his captain’s decision by producing a double blow inside the first hour. However, Yousuf and Manzoor helped Pakistan negate the early thrust with an unbroken 151-run stand for the third wicket.

Yet, Sri Lanka regained lost ground by reducing Pakistan to 289 for 7 in 86 over’s by close of play.

For Sri Lanka Vaas replaced Mendis and Kaneria replaced Abdur Rauf for Pakistan.

England breaks Lord’s jinx

England finally won a Test match against Australia at Lord’s, their first in 75 years. With this win, they go 1 up in the 5 match series.

Australia appeared to have lost its 4th day rhythm and as a result lost Haddin in the second over of the morning. From then on, Flintoff bullied the tail-enders into submission and earned his first 5 for in 4 years.

Though it was Swann who took the important wicket of Clarke, this win is sure to be talked about as a win crafted by Flintoff. For the record, England won by 115 runs. Flintoff took 5 for 92 and Swann took 4 for 86.

As Ponting rightly commented to the TMS team, it was just one match of the series and with 3 more to go one expects the Australians to come back strong.

A mouth-watering day ahead.

Image by Darwin Bell via Flickr

The 5th and final day of the 2nd Test at Lord’s is set to be a humdinger. Australia needs 209 runs and England requires another 5 wickets. The team that wins is sure to rewrite history, but going by their past performances it is more than likely that it is going to be Australia.

The 4th day started with England declaring and leaving Australia to score 522 to win. The huge target, a world record if it is overhauled, ratcheted up the expectation of a keen contest.

Unfortunately, the umpires Rudi Koertzen and Billy Doctrove with their inconsistencies proceeded to mar the expectation. Frankly, their decision-making capacity appears to have diminished in relation to the keenness of the contest. To put it mildly, they are guilty of letting their mind wander.

However, it is too early to say whether the errors will cost Australia the match. Australia being Australia simply upped the ante and refused to dwell on the umpiring errors. Instead of surrendering to fate, they rolled up their sleeves, met it head on. By the end of the day, they have managed to chip away and reduce the target to manageable proportions.

The equation is mouth watering. Australia needs just 209 and to repeat the obvious England needs just 5 wickets. There is as always a mild threat of rain, but even if there are showers, there is enough time left for both teams to achieve their ends.

This in turn leaves us with the prospect of good day’s cricket.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Time for Lord's Test virgins to come to the party (midoff.blogspot.com)

Farewell to Vaas – what about Test cricket?

Photo credit gingerpig2000

The 3rd and final test between Sri Lanka and Pakistan could well be Chaminda Vaas’s last.

Going by media reports (CSL have rubbished it), the 110 Tests veteran is to announce his retirement at the start of the third Test.

Though one values his contributions to the game of cricket highly, one disapproves the current trend of giving retiring Test cricketers a ‘final’ Test.

Granted, it gives their fans an opportunity to give their departing hero a fitting send-off; does it not devalue the Test match?

Additionally, it draws attention away from the game and proves a distraction to his teammates.

One remembers that earlier, departing heroes were give one last hurray in the form of a ‘Farewell match’.

Basically, it is a match sanctioned by their cricketing boards, where the cricketer not only gets a share of the spoils but also basks in his fans adoration one last time.

One hopes good sense returns to the throne and these cricketers who talk highly about the value of Tests cricket refuse to demean it by playing it for ego satisfaction

Bring back those ‘farewell matches’ and let us play all Tests seriously.

Time for Lord’s Test virgins to come to the party

The proceeding on the day 3 of the 2nd Ashes Test at Lord’s can be summed as follows:

Australia fell short and England refused to enforce the follow-on. Instead, England chose to pile up runs and ensure that there are no comebacks from Australia.

Let us begin at the beginning. England let Australia add 50 odd runs in the morning. Even though the situation was ripe to enforce a follow-on and pressure the Lord’s Test virgins, England preferred to negate the possibly of defeat and at the end of the 3rd’s play are 521 runs ahead.

Clearly, Strauss was concerned about denying the Australian’s time to overhaul whatever target he sets. His concern reveals that he considers Australian batting highly and his own bowling attack weak. In large part, it could be because Flintoff is patently unfit and despite their performance, Anderson and Onion are deemed sidekicks.

Despite evidence to the contrary, Strauss is not alone when it comes to overestimating Flintoff. The jingoistic English press has always inflated Flintoff’s ability by describing his minor achievements in mythological proportions.

For Strauss sake, let us hope that having made 30 in his second essay, Flintoff truly rises to the task.

Plainly, at this point, the Test match is meandering and even if England goes for some quick runs only positive intent from the gritty Australian’s can bring it to life.

Australia crumbles

Day 2, 2nd Test, Lords, Ashes 2009

The morning session went as I envisioned. The Australian’s ran through the lower order and despite a spirited display by the last pair, they polished them off without wasting time.

The stage was set for what I imagined was a Cardiff like batting display from Australia. However, there was a difference, the ball was swinging and Anderson having nicely warmed up while batting straight away picked up Hughes and Ponting.

Ponting dismissal was controversial to say the least and could well become a topic for dissertation, if Australia loses this Test, which is a possibility.

Hussey, Katich and Haddin were the only batsmen who withstood the onslaught, but they failed to carry on and squandered the opportunity. Anderson and Co. blew the rest away.

Australia at 156/8 is scampering to avoid a follow on. A hint of negativity appears to have set in already into the Australian mindset. Hussey was saying at the close of day press conference that Australia has to replicate England’s rearguard action at Cardiff to save the Test match.

England thanks to Andersons 4/36 are sitting pretty and all they needed to do is to close out the Australian innings as quickly as possible and from there on exert pressure.

Nevertheless knowing the England team’s propensity to crumble and Australia’s grittiness one expects a good contest. Their dire predicament will be motivation enough for Johnson to come swinging.

Ashes second test/ Lords/1st day

England at 364 for 6 at the end of 1st days play at Lord's.

The happy position that England finds itself can be attributed to Aussie inexperience. Remember, most of the Australian players are playing the Ashes for the first time and similarly it is their first match at Lord's.

So it is natural that they suffer a bout of nerves and that is precisely what happened in the 1st day.

Look at the course of the day, English openers are the only batsmen to have a made a fifty. The rest barring Pietersen scarcely entered double figures. Even the openers scores can be attributed to the nerves the Aussies suffered.

Mitchell Johnson was spraying the ball, the others just fed the openers with scoring opportunities.Strauss, who has remained unbeaten, had two of his catches dropped and a near run out that went for over throws. Surely, this was nothing but nerves.

Look at the turn of fortunes once the Australian's regained their composure, from a high of 255 for 2 they are now 364 for 6 with most of their recognised batsmen bat in the hut.

Going by what happened during the later part of the day, one can expect the Australian's to price out the rest of the England batting and start batting by lunch on the 2nd day.

Test Cricket is in the terminal stage

After much chin wagging the wise men have declared that Test cricket is in the terminal stage and pointed to IPL as the cause.

As there is no antidote for IPL, they conclude that it is time for all of us to face the truth and let it die a natural death.

In their eagerness to blame, the wise men appear to overlooked the fact that the real reason is the mere pointlessness of the format

Shoaib Akthar skips fitness tests

As expected Shoaib Akthar skipped the fitness test held on Monday and Tuesday. However, the fact that he informed the board of his inability to attend because of his mother’s illness surprised everyone.

Let us make it clear, Shoaib Akthar failed to turn for the fitness test and his non-appearance had nothing to do with the disappearance of genital warts.

The Flintoff ‘distraction’

Flintoff’s 4 Tests long good-bye will undoubtedly prove a distraction; the question is which team will be more distracted.

Logically, the English team will suffer the most.

Firstly, Flintoff’s fitness is uncertain and the media is sure to play it up at the start of each Test match. This could prove a distraction for the player who replaces him. Even if he is informed well in advance, the hysteria surrounding Flintoff is sure to make him feel as if he is a stand in.

Secondly, even if Flintoff is rested, every smirk of his will be analysed by the cameras hovering around the pavilion. Considering the importance of the Ashes series, there will be many ‘what if’s’.

There is also the small matter of how his teammates feel about him being the center of attraction. So logically, the English are in real danger of being distracted. However, one cannot rule out the possibility of the Australian’s experiencing the distraction.

The Australian’s will surely chaff under similar burden and if they are not on their guard, they may be swept away by the groundswell of affection surging around the stadium for Flintoff.

Each time Flintoff appears or touches the ball, a frisson is sure to run among the spectators and that could overwhelm the less experienced Australians.

The danger is so real that even Ponting has warned his teammates and asked them to steel themselves against it.

To the reader: Which team will succumb to the Flintoff ‘distraction”?

Flintoff Quits Tests

Andrew Flintoff announced that he would quit playing Test matches at the end of the Ashes series. He will be available to play for England in the shorter formats of the game.

Though Flintoff has declared that he is quitting Test cricket to prolong his cricketing career, one cannot bring oneself to deride him. Unlike others, Flintoff has undergone four ankle operations as well as suffering back, hip, shoulder and groin problems.

This catalogue of injuries as one columnist describes it, surely indicates that his body is collapsing under the strain. Flintoff carries another burden, the burden of expectations. Every time he takes the field, the nation expects him to do the star turn. Coupled with his injuries, the burden would have proved heavy for even a man as broad shouldered as he is, to bear.

Let us not deride him for his eagerness to continue playing in the shorter format of the game. May be the opportunity to let loose without the fear of injuries may well see him play to his undeniable potential?