15/07/2009

I like it

It would be an exaggeration to say that the first Ashes Test ended in acrimony. However, if you were to read what the media has to say about the obvious delaying tactics used by England, it appears as if the first salvo in World War II has been fired.

This frenzy is partly due to the media's wish to sustain the hype around this series. It can also be put down to the fact that a lot of cricketers both former and current have become experts in using these situations to gain their 5 minutes of fame.

To recount, England employed some time-wasting tactics during the 5 th day of the Cardiff Test. Now this is something most teams do. In this case England deliberately over did it to get under the prickly Ponting's nose.

To a large extent they succeeded. Ponting promptly lashed out at them in the media and elsewhere and also went to the extent of making his disappointment over the lack of official censure public.

Ideally, it should have stopped there. Both sides know that they would resort to delaying tactics to stave off defeat. An Australian bowler even admitted that even he would have done something similar.

The media, however, is in no mood to relent. Duncan Fletcher, former coach of England, has tried to get Ponting fuming by suggesting that as Ponting himself has a vague conception of 'sportsmanship': he has no right to accuse others for the lack off it.

I expect this issue to simmer until there is some other controversy, but until then, I will enjoy the fact that someone had the keen intellect to discern that Ponting is 'vague'.

14/07/2009

Pakistan disappoints

Pakistan handed the three match series to Sri Lanka in a platter. Having rode on a fine century by Fawad Alam, Pakistan collapsed predictably and from a high of 285 for one were shot out for 320.

The target of 171 was too small for Sri Lanka to worry about that they over ran it without alarms.

Frankly, though Sri Lanka won a series against Pakistan for the first time, this series win was given to them. Pakistan did everything to ensure that Sri Lanka had a cake walk.

The way in which the Pakistan batting repeatedly imploded, gives rise to doubts whether the Pakistan batsmen were sincere in their efforts.

The point is Sri Lanka did nothing to win the series. Their bowling and their batting were average and one would have to delve deeply into the records to find when a team had won a series without one of their batsmen scoring a century.

13/07/2009

Pakistan claw back

Having suffered two days of batting horror,Pakistan have done well by curtailing the Sri Lankan's to 240.

In fact they have established some sort of control over the second test, by overhauling Sri Lanka's lead. They have done themselves proud by taking a 28 runs lead for the loss of 1 wicket.

Undoubtedly a superb debut century by Fawad Alam went a long way in helping Pakistan gain ascendancy.

By their stellar batting Pakistan have given themselves a chance to equalise the equation. If Pakistan bat in the same vein tomorrow, they will surely put the fragile Sri Lankan batting under pressure.

Remember, the Sri Lankan batsmen have done nothing much in the last three innings. So it stands to reason that they will crumble under the pressure of chasing a huge score on a 5 th pitch.

Now all that Pakistan have to do is to bat well and score at a fast clip.

Will that happen?

England Escapes

Not to put a fine point to it, Australia let them. Having got rid of all but one, Australia found themselves unable to get the last batsmen out in time. The fact that Panesar was one of the obdurate pair would certainly have all Australian's gagging in their beer.

This draw will only accentuate the examination of the current Australian squad. Comparisons will be made with the earlier ones and armchair critics will somberly shake their heads thinking the earlier ones would have run over this pair without breaking into a sweat.

Coming to the England, as usual the press have painted it in martial tones, with one columnist even going as far as likening England's escape to the one in Dunkirk. Suffice to say, that this will only boost the English players ego, but the reality is at the beginning of this Test, England held all the cards. Cardiff was presumably chosen so as to take advantage of Australia's inability to play spin.

What transpired was the big-talking Swann and Panesar made nary an impression with their spin. The slow pitch was supposed to nullify the pace of the Australian bowlers thus giving the English batsmen the time to play their shots.

The plans worked but not in the manner the English desired. It was the Australian's who capitalised on the pitch and batted the English out of the game. Call it hotheadedness, call it lack of application, the fact is English batsmen were unwilling to sweat for their runs and their bowlers quit when the conditions failed to support them.

For once, the Australian's left 'mental disintegration' back home and concentrated on steeling their own determination. There was no talk only action from their end. What was supposedly a weak side in the terms of Ashes experience proved that talent and will to fight is more laudable than talent with ready made excuses for failure.

The Australian's maximised their talent, the English let it go waste. Let us hope for a better show from them at Lords.

12/07/2009

Pakistan's batting woes continues.

Pakistan suffered a major embarrassment when they were shot out for 90 runs in the first innings of the Second Test at Colombo. Coming as it does immediately after their second innings collapse at Galle one wonders whether their ICC World Twenty20 success has become a millstone.

Whatever the reason for their batting woes maybe, their rather short first innings means Pakistan in all likely hood will not only lose the second Test but also lose the series.

Ashes 2009: A lackluster series ahead

The first four days of The Ashes series 2009 has only served to highlight England’s unimaginativeness.

Granted, their batting survived the initial Ashes jitters and put up a better than expected score. However, once their bowlers failed to make an impact they fell back to a holding pattern and let the workmen like Australian batsmen pile up a huge total and forge ahead.

It is clear the England bowling strategy rested entirely on hope and a foolish expectation that the inexperienced Australian batsmen will succumb to nerves.

The English think-tank hoped that the ball would swing and their much-hyped spinners would spin the ball. Neither happened and that left them with their eternal hope Andrew Flintoff ,who for all his ‘searching examination’ of Hughes, failed to produce anything inspirational.

To make matters worse, the Australian batting led by Ponting went about their job efficiently and piled up 4 centuries creating further despondency in the English ranks.

If there is one word that sums up Strauss captaincy, then it is the word ‘disappointing’. He appears unable to rally the troops or incapable of making an instinctive move that creates opportunities against the run of play.

Typically, the ever-bombastic English media have started pointing fingers at everything. The have discerned that the pitch at Cardiff is substandard. They have identified Pietersen’s hotheaded shot that cost him his wicket as the reason for the failure of their batsmen to capitalize on the toss.

Having exaggerated Flintoff’s powers to talismanic proportions, they are now creating a haze around him by talking up his one spell to Hughes.

Barring the 2005 series, the Ashes series has been a big bore with the undisputed champions Australia beating the eternal challengers England black and blue. Despite the hype and supposed inexperience of the Australian’s this series appears set to follow a similar pattern.

11/07/2009

'bitchy' Bratich

In line with our avowed policy of pursuing the most important and relevant happenings in cricket, we bring you the photo of 'bitchy' Bratich, the girlfriend of the Aussie pacer, Mitchell Johnson.

Incidentally, his mother has accused Jessica Bratich of stealing her son away from her. She has also accused Cricket Australia of ignoring the parents of the cricketers and favouring the ‘bitchy’ girlfriends.
Photo: AdelaideNow.

To you dear reader: Should parents accompany the players or should the girlfriends accompany them on tours?

Related Link : Jessica Bratich

Ad Links

10/07/2009

Is Buchanan eligible?


Buchanan’s has done what any self-respecting coach who needs to sell a book will do, i.e., collect some shit in a socks and twirl it around his head and letting go. The principle being that some shit will hit the ceiling and provide sufficient ‘smell’ for his book sales to gain traction.

Well, his first target, Sachin has failed to rise to the challenge. His next Sunil Gavaskar is too busy celebrating his 60 th birthday to worry about the slurs. Well, his third target, Yuvraj, is unconcerned, as everyone including Yuvraj knows that Bcuhanan has spoken the truth about him.

His only hope now rests with Harbhajan Singh. The risible Bhajji has taken up the challenge and declared that Buchanan’s comment had hurt him.

Bhajji as his wont has also questioned Buchanan’s eligibility. Now do not ask what he is questioning about, it could be his eligibility to coach or even Buchanan’s ‘Teri Ma Ki’s’.

As for Mr Buchanan, having raised the awareness’ around his book he promptly denied allegations he had criticised three current Indian players and Sunil Gavaskar in his newly-released book, The Future of Cricket: The Rise of Twenty20.

Ad Links

09/07/2009

Profundity thy name is Pietersen

Pietersen explaining his yesterday’s brain fade away:
"When you get out you are out," he said. "There is nothing you can do about it.
Right my dear Pietersen, undoubtedly when you are out you are out and there is no two ways about it. Needless to add, when it comes to profundity, you almost match my friend 'proper' Niranjan Shah.

Advertisement




Enhanced by Zemanta

Now a ‘Hawk-eye (d)’ Guardian

Until now, the television broadcasters have always led the way in innovations. During a major cricket series, they inevitably introduce a new technology that enhances viewing experience. However, this Ashes series, it is the turn of an online publisher, The Guardian, to stun us by introducing Hawk-Eye analysis along with their ball-by-ball commentary.

According to them, “throughout the Ashes series you will not only be able to follow the action through our unrivalled over-by-over commentary, live galleries, session-by-session reports and live scoreboards, you will also be able to use our live and interactive Hawk-Eye analysis system”.

Probably this is the first time a major online publisher like The Guardian is introducing Hawk-Eye and letting their users set their own preferences.


To the reader: Did you check out Guardian’s new Hawk-Eye analysis tool and if so did you like it?


Enhanced by Zemanta

Wart! Shoaib Akthar declares himself fit.

Zombie March 2009 - Chicago

It is Déjà Vu time.

Shoaib Akthar claims he will make yet another comeback in the upcoming ODI series against Sri Lanka.

As usual he has declared he is fit (and cured of the skin infection as Cricinfo delicately describes it) and raring to help Pakistan cricket.

As usual, my question is whether Pakistan cricket needs him and if so will the other players accept him?

Wasim Bari, the interim chief-selector of the PCB, statement to AFP, amplifies my doubts. "I will tour Sri Lanka to consult captain Younis Khan and Coach Intikhab Alam who will give their feedback on the players. Akhtar's return will be based on his fitness, which we will assess, provided he is wanted by the team management."



To the reader: Do you believe Pakistan Cricket needs Shoaib Akthar?











Enhanced by Zemanta

08/07/2009

Ganguly – Will he or won’t he?

One small step for man...Image by Richard Parmiter via Flickr
Former India captain Sourav Ganguly has set off speculation about his willingness to become a cricket administrator by saying:

"I'm convinced that I can play a positive role," India's most successful test captain told Times of India. "Having played the game at the highest level and being part of the system, I know what it takes to make a difference."

This is an open hint for the anti- Dalmiya faction in the CAB to do their best to entice him into opposing Dalmiya. Who knows from there it is but a small step to becoming the head honcho of the BCCI.

The question is will Ganguly take that small step?

Enhanced by Zemanta

07/07/2009

Rangana Herath brings Pakistan down to the earth

Pakistan’s euphoria on winning the World ICC Twenty20 Cup unexpectedly has been pricked by this astonishing defeat at the Galle International Stadium today.

Rangana Herath, who made his Test match debut at Galle, Sri Lanka against the Australian cricket team in 1999, and his One Day International debut against the Zimbabwean cricket team at Harare Sports Ground in 2004, played in the current Test because of Murali’s injury, scuttled Pakistan dream run by earning a dramatic 50 run victory for Sri Lanka.

Herath, who along with Thilan Tushara and Ajantha Mendis, who nowadays appears to befuddle batsmen only during high-pressure situations, bamboozled Pakistan. Pakistan who were chasing only 168, were coasting along at 71/2, when they were roughly woken up only to be all-out for 117.

This defeat signals the end of Pakistan’s dream run and returns them to the mundane world.
Photo Credit: Sri Lanka Cricket
Enhanced by Zemanta

Why Dravid?

I am surprised at the inclusion of Dravid in the probable’s list for the Champions Trophy and I am sure Dravid himself would have been taken aback.

When ICC itself is thinking of rejuvenating the The Champions Trophy, it is undoubtedly funny that the Indian selectors steered by the garrulous Srikanth have selected a player who last played an ODI during 2007 against Australia at Nagpur.

The only seemingly logical argument for his inclusion is that the ODI cricket tournament is to be played in South Africa and that too in Johannesburg and Pretoria, two grounds where Dravid had a measure of success during the IPL 2009.

If the selectors are considering Dravid for his technique, then it speaks poorly of the current crop of players. However, that argument fails if you consider that Raina and Rohit too had a superlative IPL 2009 especially at the Wanderers and at the Centurion.

In essence, I believe this retrograde step is unwarranted and more in line with giving the veteran of 333 ODI’s an opportunity to pad up his income. I say this with outmost conviction, Dravid is not going to play and hence another youngster in his place would have gained the much-needed exposure to the international cricket atmosphere.

Probables:

M S Dhoni

Virender Sehwag

Gautam Gambhir

Yuvraj Singh

Rohit Sharma

Sachin Tendulkar

Rahul Dravid

Suresh Raina

Yusuf Pathan

Abhishek Nayar

Ishant Sharma

Zaheer Khan

R P Singh

Praveen Kumar

Harbhajan Singh

Pragyan Ojha

Ravindra Jadeja

Dinesh Karthik

Munaf Patel

R Ashwin

M Vijay

Amit Mishra

Ajinkya Rahane

Dhawal Kulkarni

S Badrinath

Ashish Nehra

Virat Kohli

Bhuvneshwar Kumar Singh

Wridhiman Saha

Pankaj Singh.

06/07/2009

Ashes 2009: Lee out of the 1st Test

ST. GEORGES, GRENADA - JUNE 29:  Brett Lee of ...Image by Getty Images via Daylife
The BBC reports that the Australian spearhead Brett Lee has suffered a rib injury and is likely to miss the 1st Ashes Test to start at Cardiff this Wednesday.

If he remains injured, then Australia has the unenviable task of not only recalibrating their plans but also finding a suitable replacement.
Enhanced by Zemanta

2009 Sky Ashes Promo


Hat Tip: Ashes Blog- Ashes HQ

Final ODI abandoned due to rain

West Indies vs. India, 4th ODI Beausejour Stadium, Gros Islet, St. Lucia, July 5, 2009

India takes Digicel Series 2-1 after the 4th ODI was abandoned due to rain. Though, the match had a delayed start another deluge in the middle of the 7th over halted play. As the outfield held too much water and more rain was expected, umpires Nigel Long and Clyde Duncan called off play at 1.30 p.m. local time.

This is India's 5th straight overseas ODI series triumph and its 2nd ODI series win in the West Indies.

05/07/2009

4 th Annual The Diversity Cup T20 cricket tournament 2009

It is interesting to note that a Twenty20 tournament is being played in the USA from the year 2006 onwards.

The Diversity Cup Cricket Tournament, an annual event that started in 2006, has teams based on nationalities. Four teams, Canada Maple Leafs, India Blues, Pakistan Greens and USA Stars participated in the inaugural year. In 2007, 6 teams participated as Sri Lanka Lions & West Indies Masters joined the other 4 teams.

The teams have a mixture of International, National, First Class and League players from all over USA and even overseas. Mohammad Azharuddin, former captain of India played for India Blues & Rizwan Uz Zaman, former test cricketer from Pakistan played for Pakistan Greens in 2006.

Canada Maple Leafs won the cup in 2006 and the Sri Lanka Lions won the cup in 2007. The Pakistan Greens won the 2008 edition and Javed Miandad fittingly handed over the cup to the winning Pakistan Greens team.

The 2009 edition of the Diversity Cup T20 cricket tournament is set to start in Detroit on July 3rd, 4th and 5th.

Diversity Cup 2009 Schedule:

Group A:

Match # 1: July 4 Saturday 10:00 am at Bloomer Park, Rochester Hills, MI
USA Stars Vs West Indies Masters

Match # 2: July 4 Saturday 3:00 pm at Bloomer Park, Rochester Hills, MI
India Blues Vs USA Stars

Match # 3: July 5 Sunday 10:00 am at Lyon Oaks County Park, Wixom, MI
India Blues Vs West Indies Masters

Group B:

Match # 4: July 4 Saturday 10:00 am at Lyon Oaks County Park, Wixom, MI
Canada Maple Leafs Vs Sri Lanka Lions

Match # 5: July 4 Saturday 3:00 pm at Lyon Oaks County Park, Wixom, MI
Canada Maple Leafs Vs Pakistan Greens

Match # 6: July 5 Sunday 10:30 am at Bloomer Park, Rochester Hills, MI
Pakistan Greens Vs Sri Lanka Lions

Match # 7: FINAL July 5 Sunday 3:30 pm at Bloomer Park, Rochetser Hills, MI
Winner of Group “A” Vs Winner of Group “B”

Awards Ceremony: 7:00 pm to 7:30 pm at Bloomer Park, Rochester Hills, MI

04/07/2009

Dhoni plays a winning hand

India appeared to have considered the D/L method, when they chose to field on winning the toss.

As expected, rains delayed not only the start, but interrupted the match often. In the end West Indies played 27 over’s and India played 22 overs.

The West Indies did well by posting 186 in 27 over’s. Ishanth was wayward and both Harbhajan and R.P Singh proved expensive.It is time the Indian think tank decided how best to rest and rejuvenate Ishanth. The less said off Harbhajan's bowling the better.

Fortunately, India’s opening pair of Gambhir and Karthick came good. Their 84 runs partnership in 13 overs was effervescent enough to make the task before the other batsmen manageable.

Dhoni coming in ahead of both the out of form Rohit and the inform Yuvraj was instrumental in keeping the task in sight even though a rain interruption in the 13th over marred the calculations.

In the end, it all boiled down to the last over, where 11 were needed. Dhoni proceeded to deposit the 2nd ball for a 6 and India ultimately won by 6 wickets and with a ball to spare.

Match Summary:

India defeated the West Indies by six wickets on the Duckworth/Lewis system with one ball remaining in the third one-day cricket international Friday at Beausejour Stadium.

India leads the 4 match series 2-1.
Enhanced by Zemanta

03/07/2009

Pakistans best Twenty20 team

Imran Yusuf picks his best Twenty20 team from Pakistan’s cricket history and tries to prolong Pakistan’s T20 euphoria.

 

1. Saeed Anwar 1997

2. Hanif Mohammad 1958 (wk)

3. Zaheer Abbas 1976

4. Javed Miandad 1986 (vc)

5. Inzamam-ul-Haq 2005

6. Shahid Afridi 2009

7. Imran Khan 1983 (c)

8. Wasim Akram 1996

9. Fazal Mahmood 1954

10. Saqlain Mushtaq 1999

11. Umar Gul 2009

 

Rest of15-man squad:

Waqar Younis 1994

Majid Khan 1977

Abdul Qadir 1987

Abdul Razzaq 2000

 

The number besides each name indicates the year in which that particular player played his best and hence selected on that basis.

 

My only grouse is the absence of Asif Iqbal.

 


India - West Indies 2009- Gambhir and the bowlers have to find form.

sexy mahoganyImage by graphicnoize via Flickr

3rd Digicel ODI, Beausejour Ground, St Lucia

Having surrendered their lead by losing the 2nd ODI to the West Indies, the Indians find themselves under pressure to win the 3rd match. A loss here will make the 4th and final ODI on Sunday more crucial.

Ideally, the Indians would want to win this match and ensure that they do not lose the series, but can they do it?

One fervently wish they do, because firstly, despite some resurgence the West Indies are inconsistent in their performance and secondly, the Indian batting is still powerful.

Obviously, when one speaks of Indian batting, Yuvraj looms large. His batting in the shorter formats has become the catalyst for Indian victories and a wicket that the opposition believes opens the floodgates. Thankfully, he is in form and after the failure in the 2nd ODI he will be primed for a big innings.

Apart from him, Dinesh Kaarthick has carried his IPL form. The reason for India faltering in the ICC World Twenty20 and now in this series can be put down to his partner Gautam Gambhir's sudden loss of form. Frankly, his inability to impose himself as his wont in the opening overs has put pressure on young Rohit Sharma and others who follow.

In order to win this ODI, Gambhir has to find form and one believes the impetus of his batting will straighten out the other chinks in the Indian batting line up. However, to dictate terms, the Indian bowlers have to find their sting. With R.P Singh and Ashish Nehra, warily finding their way back to International cricket the onus is on Harbhajan Singh. Sadly, he is coasting on his past performances.

In short, if India is to beat West Indies then Gambhir and the Indian bowlers have to impose themselves.

Enhanced by Zemanta

01/07/2009

Why four day test?

International Cricket CouncilImage via Wikipedia

ICC is considering four-day test matches among other innovations.

However, I ask, why four day tests if there are "better over-rates, better pitches that give a good balance between bat and ball".







Enhanced by Zemanta

Ashes 2009: Flintoff give us something to remember

Cover of Cover of Freddie: My World

As usual, everyone expects Andrew Flintoff to turn up and win The Ashes for England. Sitting here in India, one knows that is a tall order. It is intriguing how the English press and the English supporters hold such strong faith in a man who has not accomplished much since The Ashes 2005 series.

However, there is no denying the fact that whenever he played, Flintoff was inspiring and to use a word bandied often by the besotted English press, ‘talismanic’ to the English team’s fortunes.

Nevertheless, it is too much to expect him to be the same presence in 2009 as he was in 2005. So what can we expect off him?

Michael Henderson gives us a very good idea of what to reasonably expect.

This will be a good time to leave, 'Freddie', so don't disappoint your many admirers. They don't expect you to run through sides – you never did, as a record of two five-wicket hauls in 75 Tests reveals. But if you dismiss Ricky Ponting half a dozen times, before the Australian captain has got his eye in, England will be halfway towards their goal. Some runs would be nice, too, even if a significant innings is about as likely as the sight of a dolphin splashing about in Trafalgar Square.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Jeff Thomson fingers Ricky Ponting

Former Australian fast bowler Jeff Thomson has questioned Australian skipper's captaincy skills:

''I thought Ricky was crap when he was first captain in 2004 and nothing much has improved since then,'' said Thomson at the launch of the Ashes.

I am sure millions of Indians will agree with him.


30/06/2009

When should we appreciate a selector's work?

This situation in Pakistan made me think off when to appreciate a selector or a selection panel/committee.

 

Normally, I look at a selector's job as identifying, selecting and sometimes providing sufficient space for players to display their talent for their team/nation. If they do so, I deem the selector or the selector's panel to have done a good job.

 

Similarly, I do not blame them for the result, as it is not in their hands. They can only select the best and it is up to the players to prove their worth and in turn win matches.

 

Now here is the interesting conundrum, should we appreciate them for selecting a winning combination or selecting a winning, as in victorious, team?

 

Recent Post:

 

A non-sense series

 

 

 

 

29/06/2009

A lopsided Hall of Fame

Wisden
The ICC revealed its list of cricketing greats chosen for the Hall of Fame.

The list contains 22 Englishmen, 11 Australians, 13 West Indians, three each from India, Pakistan and two South Africans and a lone New Zealander.

The ICC Hall of Fame follows the The Wisden route. The venerable almanac nominates an Englishman as the cricketer of the year 9 times out of 10 and the ICC has followed suit.

When many nations have legends waiting to be honored, it is beguiling how the English cricketers make approximately half of a 50-member list.

One cannot help but wonder at the impartiality of the ICC and speculate whether a majority of the ICC members yearn for an English ascendency in cricket in one form or the other.



Enhanced by Zemanta